Criminal Liability for the Misuse of Deepfakes and Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Cyber Fraud Offenses

Authors

  • Melita Nur Rizqia Nisa Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Edi Saputra Hasibuan Universitas Bhayangakara Jakarta Raya, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Diana Fitriana Universitas Bhayangakara Jakarta Raya, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/snlpr.v3i1.1250

Keywords:

Deepfake, Artificial Intelligence, Criminal Liability, Cyber Fraud, UU ITE

Abstract

Rapid developments in Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology, specifically deepfake, have created complex legal challenges in cybercrime enforcement. Deepfake technology allows hyper-realistic manipulation of audio and video, which bad actors increasingly exploit for cyber fraud and identity theft. The research gap lies in the ambiguity of traditional criminal law frameworks and existing electronic information laws in defining specific liability for AI-driven impersonation and synthetic fraud. This study aims to analyze the criminal law qualification of deepfake misuse in cyber fraud and determine the individual, corporate, and platform liability under Indonesian positive law. Using a normative legal methodology with statutory and conceptual approaches, this study examines relevant provisions in the Criminal Code (KUHP) and the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE). The results indicate that deepfake-assisted fraud fulfills the elements of electronic document forgery under Article 35 UU ITE and fraud under Article 28 paragraph (1) UU ITE alongside Article 378 KUHP. Criminal liability can be attributed to individual perpetrators based on intentionality (dolus), while platform providers may face liability under duty of care principles and corporate criminal liability provisions. The novelty of this study lies in formulating a comprehensive criminal attribution model for AI-generated synthetic content within Indonesian cyber law reform.

References

Chesney, R., & Citron, D. K. (2019). Deepfakes and the new disinformation threat. Foreign Affairs, 98(1), 147–155.

Flynn, A., Clough, J., & Sifris, R. (2022). Deepfakes, image-based sexual abuse and the law. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 11(1), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.2120

Kosta, E. (2021). Algorithmic accountability and the law: Liability for artificial intelligence systems. Computer Law & Security Review, 40, 105501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105501

Moeljatno. (2015) . Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Rineka Cipta.

Nguyen, T. T., Quach, C. M., Nguyen, T. N., Nguyen, D. T., & Liew, A. W. C. (2022). Deep learning for deepfake detection: A survey. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 223, 103525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cviu.2022.103525

Soerjono, S., & Sri, M. (2018). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Rajawali Pers.

Spivak, J. (2021). Deepfakes: The modern face of cybercrime and identity theft. Journal of Cyber Policy, 6(2), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/23738871.2021.1943801

Westerlund, M. (2019). The emergence of deepfakes and synthetic media. Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(11), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1282

Published

2026-10-30

How to Cite

Nisa, M. N. R., Hasibuan, E. S., & Fitriana, D. (2026). Criminal Liability for the Misuse of Deepfakes and Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Cyber Fraud Offenses. Siber Nusantara of Law and Politic Review, 3(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.38035/snlpr.v3i1.1250

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.