Legal Gaps in Regulation and Criminal Liability for the Use of Personal Mobility Devices on Sidewalks and Roads

Authors

  • Sapta Eka Yanto Borobudur University, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Dwi Kusumo Wardhani Borobudur University, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/snlpr.v2i1.723

Keywords:

Personal Mobility Devices, Traffic Law, Legal Gaps, Criminal Liability, Public Safety

Abstract

The development of micro-transportation technology has given rise to Personal Mobility Devices (PMDs) as a new mode of mobility increasingly used in public spaces, both on sidewalks and on roads. The presence of PMDs raises legal issues because the Indonesian traffic law system does not yet provide clear and comprehensive regulations regarding the status, usage space, and criminal liability mechanisms for users. Law Number 22 of 2009 concerning Traffic and Road Transportation still relies on conventional vehicle classifications, placing PMDs in a normative area that is not explicitly addressed. The condition creates legal uncertainty, difficulty in enforcement, and potential violations of the safety of pedestrians and other road users. This study aims to analyze the nature of the legal vacuum in PMD regulations, examine the weaknesses of the applicable criminal liability construction, and formulate the need for more adaptive traffic law reform. The research method employed is normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and comparative legal approaches. A comparative analysis was conducted on PMD regulations in Singapore, the United Kingdom, Germany, and France to identify a proportional and safety-oriented regulatory model. The results reveal that a purely repressive approach through criminal law is ineffective when applied to PMDs and risks excessive criminalization. This study recommends reforming traffic law through special regulations on Personal Mobility Devices (PMD) that prioritize administrative and preventive approaches, along with selective criminal sanctions to ensure legal certainty and public safety.

References

Adiatma, A. F.-q. (2025). Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas Melalui Mediasi Penal. Judge: Jurnal Hukum, 6(02), 41-47.

Devid, R. I. (2025). Tantangan Hukum dan Keamanan Mobil Auto Pilot Perspektif Hukum Transportasi di Indonesia. Sosaintek: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Sains dan Teknologi, 2(1), 82-95.

Erlyani, R. P. (2024). Dinamika Politik Hukum Dalam Konteks Perubahan Sosial. Lex Sharia Pacta Sunt Servanda: Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Kebijakan, 2(1), 14-24.

Faniyah, I. &. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pengguna Jalan Yang Mengalami Kecelakaan Lalulintas Karena Kelalaian Penyelenggara Jalan. Ekasakti Legal Science Journal, 1(3), 196-203.

Firmansyah, F. D. (2024). Evaluating Legal Protections for Pedestrians and Infrastructure in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review, 19(3), 10-21.

Haerunisa, S. (2025). Dilema keseimbangan dalam penegakan hukum: Analisis kritis terhadap penerapan teori tujuan hukum (keadilan, kepastian, dan kemanfaatan). Manazir: Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Ibnu Chaldun, 1(2).

Indah, R. M. (2025). Penemuan hukum sebagai implementasi teori hukum dalam menjawab kekosongan norma. Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI), 3(4).

Kurniawan, D. (2020). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Penyelenggara Jalan. Jurnal Ilmu Kepolisian, 14(2), 9-9.

Laverdet, C. M. (2023). Electric personal mobility device driver behaviors, their antecedents and consequences: a narrative review. Journal of safety research, 86, 274-285.

Lazarus, L. (2024). Pengaruh Teknologi dan Globalisasi Terhadap Sistem Hukum dan Identitas Sosial Masyarakat. Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI), 2(2).

Manurung, P. (2025). Analisis Yuridis Pertanggungjawaban Pelaku Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas Dalam Perspektif Hukum Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2009 Tentang Lalu Lintas Dan Angkutan Jalan: Studi Putusan Nomor 2698/Pid. Sus/2018/PN Lbp. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 3(2), 878-892.

Muntaha, M. G. (2025). Hukum dan Ketertiban Lalu Lintas: Perspektif Sosiologi Hukum pada Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2009. Gunung Djati Conference Series, 50, 52-64.

Nasir, G. A. (2017). Kekosongan Hukum & Percepatan Perkembangan Masyarakat. Jurnal Hukum Replik, 5(2), 172-183.

Noor, M. A. (2025). Penyalahgunaan Trotoar di Kawasan Perkotaan: Dampak dan Strategi Penanganan untuk Mewujudkan Ruang Publik yang Inklusif. JUITECH: Jurnal Ilmiah Fakultas Teknik Universitas Quality, 9(1), 98-104.

Pebrian, A. Y. (2025). Mewujudkan Kota Smart City Melalui Peraturan Hukum Untuk Pejalan Kaki Dalam Perencanaan Transportasi Berkelanjutan. Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani, 15(2), 324-340.

Rahmawati, A. N. (2023). Analisis Konsep New Urbanism Dan Dampak Pada Perilaku Mobilitas Masyarakat Perkotaan di Indonesia. EKOMA: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, Akuntansi, 3(1), 415-424.

Razaob, N. A. (2020). Development and Validation of a Personal Care Modules for Older Adults with More Signifcant Disabilities. Jurnal Sains Kesihatan Malaysia, 18(02), 83-92.

Roeroe, W. M. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pejalan Kaki Di Area Zebra Cross Menurut Uu Lalu Lintas Dan Angkutan Jalan. Lex Privatum, 14(2).

Shin, G. W. (2018). Personal mobility device and user experience: A state-of-the-art literature review. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 62(1), 1336-1337.

Sugiarto, U. S. (2021). Pengantar Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Suseno, D. P. (2024). Transportasi Darat Dan Smart Mobility System. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Yunus, M. M. (2024). Investasi dan Reformasi Transportasi Kota. Banda Aceh: Syiah Kuala University Press.

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

Yanto, S. E., & Wardhani, D. K. (2025). Legal Gaps in Regulation and Criminal Liability for the Use of Personal Mobility Devices on Sidewalks and Roads. Siber Nusantara of Law and Politic Review, 2(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.38035/snlpr.v2i1.723

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.