Service Reliability, Service Value, and Timeliness as Drivers of Customer Loyalty: The Mediating Roles of Relationship Marketing and Customer Satisfaction in Corporate Logistics Services

Authors

  • Della Galuh Anastasia Universitas Logistik dan Bisnis Internasional, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Maniah Maniah Universitas Logistik dan Bisnis Internasional, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Erna Mulyati Universitas Logistik dan Bisnis Internasional, Bandung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/sjtl.v4i2.1063

Keywords:

Corporate Logistics Services, Customer Loyalty, Customer Satisfaction, Relationship Marketing, Service Reliability

Abstract

One of decisive challenges faced within business-to-business (B2B) logistics industry is maintaining customer loyalty due to customer expectations and inconsistent findings increasement regarding its determinants. The impacts analysis towards service reliability and value, also timeliness onto customer loyalty were developed extensively in this research, using relationship marketing as well customer satisfaction for corporate logistics services at PT Pos Indonesia (Persero). A quantitative descriptive-verificative methodology was applied. Purposive sampling technique was used to collect 157 corporate customers data eligibly in Regional 2 Jakarta to get examined with Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Test outcome explains service reliability (β = 0.279; t = 2.298) and timeliness (β = 0.426; t = 3.529) significantly affect relationship marketing, whereas service value does not (β = 0.155; t = 1.166). Significant influence delivered by relationship marketing onto customer satisfaction with (β = 0.809; t = 20.776) while loyalty contributed (β = 0.330; t = 3.623), meanwhile satisfaction notably affects loyalty (β = 0.558; t = 6.819). Relationship marketing mediates only the effect of timeliness on customer loyalty, whereas relationship mediation was delivered by satisfaction onto marketing relation towards customer loyalty, highlighting sequential relational mechanisms in corporate logistics. These findings provide theoretical and managerial implications for improving customer retention strategies in B2B corporate logistics services.

References

Anderson, E. W. (1998). Customer satisfaction and word of mouth. Journal of Service Research, 1(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/109467059800100102

Buttle, F., & Maklan, S. (2019). Customer relationship management: Concepts and technologies (4th ed.). Routledge.

Davis, B. R., & Mentzer, J. T. (2006). Logistics service driven loyalty: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Logistics, 27(2), 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2006.tb00217.x

Gaudenzi, B., Confente, I., & Russo, I. (2021). Logistics service quality and customer satisfaction in B2B relationships: A qualitative comparative analysis approach. The TQM Journal, 33(1), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-04-2020-0088

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203

Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., & Gremler, D. D. (2002). Understanding relationship marketing outcomes. Journal of Service Research, 4(3), 230–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670502004003006

Henseler, J., Hubona, G. S., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(1), 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Mentzer, J. T., Flint, D. J., & Hult, G. T. M. (2001). Logistics service quality as a segment-customized process. Journal of Marketing, 65(4), 82–104. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.65.4.82.18390

Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20–38.

Oliver, R. L. (1997). Satisfaction: A behavioral perspective on the consumer. McGraw-Hill.

Palmatier, R. W., Dant, R. P., Grewal, D., & Evans, K. (2006). Factors influencing the effectiveness of relationship marketing: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing, 70(4), 136–153. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.70.4.136

Payne, A., & Frow, P. (2005). A strategic framework for customer relationship management. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 167–176.

Sugiyono. (2021). Metode riset kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Wardhani, C. A., Sugianto, A., & Hermana, B. (2020). Pengaruh kualitas layanan logistik, kepuasan pelanggan, dan citra merek terhadap loyalitas pelanggan jasa logistik menggunakan structural equation model. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Industri, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.24912/jitiuntar.v8i1.5761

Yang, Z., & Peterson, R. T. (2004). Customer perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty: The role of switching costs. Psychology & Marketing, 21(10), 799–822. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20030

Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2–22.

Published

2026-08-01

How to Cite

Anastasia, D. G., Maniah, M., & Mulyati, E. (2026). Service Reliability, Service Value, and Timeliness as Drivers of Customer Loyalty: The Mediating Roles of Relationship Marketing and Customer Satisfaction in Corporate Logistics Services. Siber Journal of Transportation and Logistics, 4(2), 252–266. https://doi.org/10.38035/sjtl.v4i2.1063

Most read articles by the same author(s)