Formulating a Maritime Risk Matrix Based on Ancient Text Quantification: Man-Made versus Natural Risks

Authors

  • Vigih Hery Kristanto Politeknik Pelayaran Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Suharto Suharto Politeknik Pelayaran Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Dyah Purwitasari Politeknik Pelayaran Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • M. Anjar Pamungkas Politeknik Pelayaran Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/sjtl.v4i1.910

Keywords:

ALARP, Formal Safety Assessment, Hisab Al-Jummal, Human Error, Maritime Safety

Abstract

Contemporary maritime safety management generally relies on technical approaches, whereas historical analyses can provide a fundamental perspective regarding disaster taxonomy. This research aims to elaborate on the threat weight divergence between human-induced risk variables (Man-Made Risk) and Natural Risk extracted from a corpus of ancient texts, as well as to examine their implications for mapping the ALARP tolerance limits in maritime regulations. This study employs an explanatory quantitative approach integrating computational linguistics with the Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) framework. Ten maritime hazard keywords were converted into absolute numerical units using the Hisab Al-Jummal system of the Masyriqi school, normalized, and calibrated with empirical probabilities to map the Risk Score on a 5×5 matrix. The analysis results prove that Man-Made Risk, specifically the keyword zulm meaning negligence and regulatory violations clearly dominates the hazard hierarchy in the Unacceptable Region with the highest score. Conversely, natural physical threats such as high waves with the keyword mawj have been effectively reduced to acceptable levels due to the standardization of modern ship architecture. The findings indicate prioritize regulatory enforcement that extreme natural conditions essentially act as an initial trigger, while negative human intervention is the primary catalyst for mass maritime tragedies. In conclusion, the results of this study are crucial in encouraging a shift in maritime mitigation strategies so that they do not solely focus on avoiding extreme weather, but rather prioritize regulatory enforcement, regulatory audits, and the strengthening of safety culture.

References

Direktorat Meteorologi Maritim BMKG. (2026, April). Buletin Meterorologi Oseanografi Indonesia. 5, 4–98.

Dominguez-Péry, C., Tassabehji, R., Corset, F., & Chreim, Z. (2023). A holistic view of maritime navigation accidents and risk indicators: examining IMO reports from 2011 to 2021. Journal of Shipping and Trade, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41072-023-00135-y

Fan, S., Blanco-Davis, E., Yang, Z., Zhang, J., & Yan, X. (2020). Incorporation of human factors into maritime accident analysis using a data-driven Bayesian network. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 203, 107070. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.107070

International Maritime Organization, I. (2018). Revised Guidelines for Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) for Use In The Imo Rule-Making Process.

Komite Nasional Keselamatan Transportasi. (2025). Laporan Statistik Investigasi Kecelakaan Transportasi Semester I.

Langdalen, H., Abrahamsen, E. B., & Selvik, J. T. (2020). On the importance of systems thinking when using the ALARP principle for risk management. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 204, 107222. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESS.2020.107222

Latt, N. Z. (2024). Mitigating the Risk of Ship Accidents with an Integrated Approach to Maritime Safety Management. Maritime Park Journal of Maritime Technology and Society, 8–15. https://doi.org/10.62012/mp.v3i2.35385

Maternová, A., Materna, M., Dávid, A., Török, A., & Švábová, L. (2023). Human Error Analysis and Fatality Prediction in Maritime Accidents. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 11(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11122287

Melnyk, O., Sagaydak, O., Voloshyn, A., Lebedieva, L., & Radchenko, I. (2024). Risk Management and its Impact on Efficiency of Ship Operations. Grail of Science, (45), 150–161. https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.01.11.2024.016

Pratheebha, T., Indhumathi, V., & Megala, S. S. (2021). AN EMPIRICAL STUDY ON DATA MINING TECHNIQUES AND ITS APPLICATIONS. International Journal of Software & Hardware Research in Engineering, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.26821/ijshre.9.4.2021.9410

Sharma, H., Jindal, H., & Sehgal, A. (2023). Early Prediction of Coronary Artery Disease Using Data Mining Techniques. 2023 International Conference on Advanced Computing & Communication Technologies (ICACCTech), 307–310. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACCTech61146.2023.00056

Singh, A., Dalaklis, D., & Baumler, R. (2023). Revisiting the HNoMS Helge Ingstad and Sola TS collision: Discussing the contribution of human factors. Maritime Technology and Research, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.33175/mtr.2023.262199

Syed Omar, S. H., Md Shariff, N. N., Zainal, B., & Hamidi, Z. S. (2025). Aritmetik penentuan takwim Hijri oleh Syeikh Abdul Rahman Gudang al-Fatani dalam Minhaj al-Qawim. Ulum Islamiyyah, 37(02), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.33102/uij.vol37no02.652

Taufik, F. M., & Alwi, A. I. (2024). Al-Mathla’Al-Sa’id Fii Hisabat Al-Kawakib ‘Ala Rashd Al-Jadid. Elfalaky: Jurnal Ilmu Falak, 8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24252/ifk.v8i1.46959

Th Yaseen, A. (2021). Data Mining Between Classical and Modern Applications: A Review. In & Math’s (Vol. 15, Number 2). DOI.

Wang, S., Yin, J., & Khan, R. U. (2020). The multi-state maritime transportation system risk assessment and safety analysis. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(14), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145728

Waskito, D. H., Faishal, M., Handoyo, T., Kurniawan, I., & Hamonangan, J. S. (2024). System Theory and Human Factors Hazard Identification Approach for Marine Survey Operation. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1423(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1423/1/012006

Wu, B., Yip, T. L., Yan, X., & Guedes Soares, C. (2022). Review of techniques and challenges of human and organizational factors analysis in maritime transportation. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 219, 108249. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESS.2021.108249

Xiao, X., Zhu, H., Liang, J., Tong, J., & Wang, H. (2025). A Comprehensive Review of Human Error in Risk-Informed Decision Making: Integrating Human Reliability Assessment, Artificial Intelligence, and Human Performance Models. 1–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.01017

Zhong, B., Pan, X., Love, P. E. D., Sun, J., & Tao, C. (2020). Hazard analysis: A deep learning and text mining framework for accident prevention. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 46, 101152. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2020.101152

Published

2026-07-05

How to Cite

Kristanto, V. H., Suharto, S., Purwitasari, D., & Pamungkas, M. A. (2026). Formulating a Maritime Risk Matrix Based on Ancient Text Quantification: Man-Made versus Natural Risks. Siber Journal of Transportation and Logistics, 4(1), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.38035/sjtl.v4i1.910