Maritime Accident Risk Assessment as a Basis for Selecting Anchorage Area Locations: A Perception Study in the Waters of Riau Islands, East Kalimantan, and South Kalimantan

Authors

  • Raden Aditya Wirawan Institut Transportasi dan Logistik Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/sjtl.v4i1.859

Keywords:

area labuh jangkar, KPBU, Keamanan serta Keselamatan, Pelayaran, Risiko kecelakaan

Abstract

This study aims to analyze stakeholder perceptions regarding the risk of shipping accidents as a basis for consideration in selecting locations for anchorage areas to be commercialized in the waters of Riau Islands (Kepri), East Kalimantan (Kaltim), and South Kalimantan (Kalsel) Provinces. The method used is a descriptive quantitative and qualitative survey of 39 respondents consisting of representatives from the Ministry of Transportation (56.4%), Local Government (15.4%), Associations (7.7%), the Private Sector (15.4%), and Academics (5.1%). The survey results indicate that the majority of respondents (71.8%) stated that the marine location significantly influences the risk of shipping accidents. Marine environmental conditions were deemed highly influential by 79.5% of respondents, and 84.6% of respondents stated that a combination of extreme conditions (storms, high waves, and strong currents) constitutes the primary threat. From a shipping traffic perspective, 82.1% of respondents selected a combination of congested conditions, narrow waters, and the absence of Aid to Navigation (AtoN) as the greatest potential risk. Regarding anchoring, 97.4% of respondents agreed that the designation of these areas needs to be carried out by the government, and 79.5% designated the Ministry of Transportation as the authorized organizer. Furthermore, 87.2% of respondents supported the Public-Private Partnership (PPP) scheme, with Concession and Utilization Cooperation (KSP) being the preferred options at 41% each. The urgency of risk assessment in location selection obtained an average score of 4.26 on a scale of 5, while the value of safety as an investment parameter reached an average of 4.64.

References

IMO. (2018). Guidelines for Vessel Traffic Services. International Maritime Organization, London.

Kementerian Perhubungan RI. (2023). Statistik Perhubungan Laut. Direktorat Jenderal Perhubungan Laut, Jakarta.

Peraturan Presiden Nomor 38 Tahun 2015 tentang Kerja Sama Pemerintah dengan Badan Usaha dalam Penyediaan Infrastruktur.

Trbojevic, V. M., & Carr, B. J. (2000). Risk Based Methodology for Safety Improvements in Ports. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 71(1–3), 467–480.

Undang-Undang Nomor 66 Tahun 2024 tentang Perubahan Ketiga atas Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2008 tentang Pelayaran

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 17 Tahun 2008 tentang Pelayaran.

Valtinsen, O.M. (1990). Sea Loads On Ships And Offshore Structures. Cambridge University Press.

Widagdo, P. S., et al. (2023). Karakteristik Kondisi Perairan dan Lalu Lintas Pelayaran di Kepulauan Riau, Kalimantan Timur, dan Kalimantan Selatan: Tinjauan dari Perspektif Pemangku Kepentingan. Jurnal Penelitian Transportasi Laut, 25(2), 88–104.

Yip, T. L. (2008). Port Traffic Risks — A Study of Accidents in Hong Kong Waters. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 44(5), 921–931.

Published

2026-06-29

How to Cite

Wirawan, R. A. (2026). Maritime Accident Risk Assessment as a Basis for Selecting Anchorage Area Locations: A Perception Study in the Waters of Riau Islands, East Kalimantan, and South Kalimantan. Siber Journal of Transportation and Logistics, 4(1), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.38035/sjtl.v4i1.859